Legal Briefs

Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Louisvile School District

In November 2004, The Civil Rights Project filed an Amicus Curiae brief in support of the Louisville School District. CRP’s brief focuses both on the social science research on the issue of the educational and social benefits of desegregation, and on the extensive record developed on the benefits of the Louisville plan in particular. The brief also argues that the Louisville plan is narrowly tailored and that the standards for considering narrow tailoring in the K-12 context should more carefully fit the realities of K-12 education.

Amicus Curiae Brief in Hancock v. Driscoll

In August 2004, The Civil Rights Project filed an amicus brief in support of the Hancock plaintiffs against the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The brief highlighted our research depicting the confluence of racial isolation and high poverty in Massachusetts. We argued that under the Massachusetts constitution far too many students in high poverty districts, and especially minority students, are receiving an inadequate education.

Amicus Curiae Brief in Comfort v. Lynn School Committe

The Civil Rights Project filed a brief in June 2004 in support of the Lynn School Committee and state defendants in the case of Comfort v. Lynn School Committee, a challenge to the voluntary integration plan in Lynn, Massachusetts that is currently on appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Amicus Curiae Briefs in University of Michigan Admissions Cases

AERA, AAHE and AAC&U filed amicus briefs, prepared on their behalf by Angelo Ancheta with assistance from other CRP staff. The briefs summarize the social science evidence bearing on the central constitutional questions of affirmative action before the Supreme Court.