Personal tools
You are here: Home Legal Developments Legal Memos

Legal Memos

Policy Briefing Reaffirming Diversity: A Legal Analysis of the University of Michigan Affirmative Action Cases
On June 23, 2003, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in Grutter v. Bollinger and upheld the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies designed to promote diversity in higher education.
Policy Briefing Revisiting Bakke and Diversity-Based Admissions: Constitutional Law, Social Science Research, and the University of Michigan Affirmative Action Cases
The decisions of the United States Supreme Court in two major cases – Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger – are expected to have broad effects on the future of race-conscious affirmative action in the United States.
Policy Briefing Constitutional Requirements for Affirmative Action In Higher Education Admissions And Financial Aid
Race-conscious affirmative action programs in higher education are subject to "strict scrutiny," which is the highest standard of review used by the courts to evaluate a policy's constitutionality.
Policy Briefing Overview of Constitutional Requirements In Race-Conscious Affirmative Action Policies In Education
Almost all educational institutions are required to meet strict legal requirements when taking race into account in admissions, financial aid, student assignment, and other educational policy decisions.
Policy Briefing Constitutional Requirements for Race-Conscious Policies In K-12 Education
Voluntary efforts to promote racial integration at the K-12 level have met strong resistance from the courts in recent years, despite the long history of court involvement in desegregration litigation.
Document Actions

Copyright © 2010 UC Regents