Personal tools
You are here: Home Research K-12 Education Language Minority Students Assessment of Young English Language Learners in Arizona: Questioning the Validity of the State Measure of English Proficiency

Assessment of Young English Language Learners in Arizona: Questioning the Validity of the State Measure of English Proficiency

Authors: Eugene Garcia, Kerry Lawton, Eduardo H. Diniz de Figueiredo
Date Published: July 08, 2010

Part 9 of the Arizona Educational Equity Project. The present assessment policy is likely denying services ELLs need and violating the rights of these students to an equal educational opportunity.
Related Documents

July 2010

Assessment of Young English Language Learners in Arizona: Questioning the Validity of the State Measure of English Proficiency

by Eugene Garcia, Kerry Lawton & Eduardo H. Diniz de Figueiredo

Abstract:

This study analyzes the Arizona policy of utilizing a single assessment of English proficiency to determine if students should be exited from the ELL program , which is ostensibly designed to make it possible for them to succeed in the mainstream classroom without any further language support. The study examines the predictive validity of this assessment instrument on ELLs' performance on state required academic achievement tests at three grade levels. It finds that at subsequent grade levels after redesignation, the "one-test" AZELLA becomes less predictive of academic achievement, That is, the test over predicts student achievement, suggesting that many students may be under-served due to their scores the test. This finding calls into question Arizona's "one-test" procedure for redesignating ELLs to a non-service category. Given the large and increasing size of the ELL student population in Arizona, the current focus on testing and accountability, and the documented problems in current assessment practices, improvement in instruments and procedures is critical. These improvements are necessary at all phases of the assessment process, but as this study indicates, the present policy is likely denying services these student need and violating the rights of these students to an equal educational opportunity.



In compliance with the UC Open Access Policy, this report has been made available on eScholarship:

http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6xx644b5

Document Actions

Copyright © 2010 UC Regents